How staking remuneration is generated and why it differs between the two networks
Protocol staking on Ether and Solana is often described as passive income, but it is something more precise: the remuneration granted to those who help keep a Proof-of-Stake blockchain running. Understanding how that yield arises, and why it differs between the two networks, is the first step to assessing it properly.
Staking is not interest, but paid work
On Proof-of-Stake networks, updating the blockchain does not require the computing power of mining, but a commitment of collateral. Participants pledge an amount of the same crypto asset as proof of the honesty with which they will carry out the work of validation. The higher the collateral, the greater the involvement in the network and the corresponding remuneration.
The logic is punitive, not preventive: misconduct can lead to the confiscation of part of the collateral. This is where protocol staking differs markedly from simply holding. The yield is not interest granted by an intermediary, but compensation for a service rendered to the protocol, which at the same time strengthens its security.
Ether and Solana: why the higher yield is not always the better one
On paper, Solana looks more generous. Its nominal yield ranges around 6-8% per year, against Ether’s 3-4%. But the nominal figure tells only half the story.
Solana still issues new tokens at a high rate, close to 5-6% a year, gradually declining toward a long-term floor of 1.5%. Net of this dilution, the real yield thins out considerably. Ether follows the opposite logic: contained issuance, around 1%, and a lower nominal yield that nonetheless translates into a real yield often comparable or higher.
The comparison between the two networks thus reveals two distinct economic models.
What it means for those who hold Ether and Solana
Significant operational differences remain. Ether requires 32 ETH to activate a validator, an obstacle that CheckSig’s staking service overcomes by pooling the funds of several clients; Solana has no minimum SOL amount and currently applies no slashing penalties at the protocol level.
Seen from this perspective, protocol staking helps preserve one’s position on the network. As new tokens are issued, those who hold Ether or Solana without staking tend to see their share diluted over time; by taking part, that value is recovered at least in part.
These are technical details, but they affect the risk profile and liquidity. The question, then, is not only how much staking yields or how it works, but which network remunerates more sustainably the work of those who sustain it.
Advertising message.
Crypto-assets are highly risky and volatile and may result in the total or partial loss of capital. This content is promotional in nature and does not constitute financial, legal or tax advice, nor an investment recommendation. CheckSig is authorised by CONSOB as a CASP under MiCAR for the services set out in its authorisation. Risks, costs and conditions at checksig.com/eu/en/pricing
